November 09, 2006
Tuesday night I did start to wonder how flawed our polling system is. The polls here closed at 7:00 PM, we didnÂ’t start getting election news/results until around 8:00. By 8:30 you still couldnÂ’t get an accurate picture of how the election was going. Depending on what news source you where looking at, they all give different figures. Three local channels, the local newspaper and two radio stations couldnÂ’t agree on any results. At a little past 9:00 PM one station declared Blagojevich the winner while another station showed Topinka in the lead. The newspaper had a state representative loosing as well as a US congressman, but two of the stations had them both winning. Some races showed really close in one place and on opponent to have a wide lead at others. No two had numbers that even resembled the other sources. It went on this way all night. I finally gave up watching and checking the results because it was frustrating and annoying.
I’m trying to figure out how all of these “reliable” news sources could have widely varying results. I know I’m not that savvy in the ways of how votes are counted and election results reported, but one would think they would have a least a uniform or single point of media release. I’m also wondering how accurate any of the election results actually where.
Yea, thatÂ’s another rung in my ladder of lost faith in our government.
Posted by: Contagion at
05:49 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 326 words, total size 2 kb.
I never watch those post election coverage shows - they're all crap. They pull numbers out of their nether regions because getting the actual numbers from the official web sites would be too much like "work" - the dreaded 4 letter word.
Posted by: Teresa at November 10, 2006 11:16 AM (o4pJS)
But there's only fraud when they lose..
Uh huh...
Posted by: Wes at November 11, 2006 03:19 PM (eZAe8)
63 queries taking 0.0423 seconds, 142 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








